APQN Members
Wuhan Golden Apple Technology Development Service Limited (Golden Apple Ranking)
Membership Type: Full
Email: Jpqiu@hdu.edu.cn
Year in which Organisation/Agency commenced operations: 2009
Countries/regions/states of operation: china
Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Title: Senior Professor
First Name: Junping
Surname: Qiu
Job Title: Dean
Phone: 86-571-86873899
Email Id: jpqiu@hdu.edu.cn
Nominated Contact Person (if different from CEO)
First Name: Jing
Surname: Tian
Job Title: Center Director
Email Id: Tianjing2018@hdu.edu.cn
Organisation Details
Wuhan Golden Apple Technology Development Service Limited (Golden Apple Ranking)
Address: 3rd floor, Science and technology Building, Hangzhou Dianzi University, 2nd Road Higher Education District, Qiantang New District, Hangzhou Zhejiang, 310018
China
Website: www.nseac.com
Additional Contacts
Criteria Requirements for Full Member
1 Criterion: Nature of the operations of the agency:
Measure: The agency is responsible for reviews at institutional or programme level of post-secondary
education institutions or post-secondary quality assurance agencies
Measure: The agency is responsible for reviews at institutional or programme level of post-secondary
education institutions or post-secondary quality assurance agencies
Description: The Evaluation Center of Chinese Education Quality, ECCEQ is an academic institution of across-liberal-arts-and-science trans-disciplines, which is co-sponsored by Information Management School, the Universityâ??s Library, Computer Center and Library & Information Institute of Wuhan University, and is located in the Information Management School.
The Center is the first one of comprehensive research center for science evaluation among Chinese colleges and universities, and is also a multifunctional agency entity engaging in researching, teaching, training and serving in evaluation and consultation.
The Center is the first one of comprehensive research center for science evaluation among Chinese colleges and universities, and is also a multifunctional agency entity engaging in researching, teaching, training and serving in evaluation and consultation.
2 Criterion: Mission statement and objectives:
Measure: The agency has formulated a mission statement and objectives which are consistent with the nature of the agency
Measure: The agency has formulated a mission statement and objectives which are consistent with the nature of the agency
Description: The Center is based on the tenet of â??innovative research and open serviceâ?, to serve for the countryâ??s strategy of science and educationâ??s prospering the country and for the modern construction, by the way of gathering social resources from home and abroad, creating new academic mechanism, fostering specialized personnel in evaluation and improving evaluation-consultation work.
The development goal of the center is to become one of the key research bases of the Humanities and Social Science of the Ministry of Education, or of the province, and then to become one of the first-rate evaluation centers in the country and of the well-known ones in the world through several yearsâ?? great efforts, while the Center now is one of Wuhan University.
The development goal of the center is to become one of the key research bases of the Humanities and Social Science of the Ministry of Education, or of the province, and then to become one of the first-rate evaluation centers in the country and of the well-known ones in the world through several yearsâ?? great efforts, while the Center now is one of Wuhan University.
3 Criterion: Agency staff, Numbers, Profile, Roles:
Measure: The profile of the staff is consistent with the Mission Statement
Measure: The profile of the staff is consistent with the Mission Statement
Description: The researchers of the Center consist of full-time researchers and part-time ones. Now there are 22 full-time researchers and 8 full-time ones (the first group), most of them coming from famous universities or relevant institutions home and abroad. They are either well-known experts or young doctors and masters, who form a better academic team with quite appropriate structure in their knowledge, ages and academic titles. The main researchers are listed as follows:
Pro. Chen Guangzuo: male, consultant of the Center, research officer, doctorate supervisor
Pro. Qiu Junping : male, director of the Center, doctorate supervisor
Pro.Yan Jinwei: male, vice-director of the Center, research officer
Li Jinaping: male, vice-director of the Center, research officer
Dr. Zhang Liyi: male, vice-director of the Center, research officer
Zhou Minghua: male, director of the research branch, research officer
Dr. Zhou Liming: female, director of the office, research officer
Dr. Zhang Meijuan: female, secretary of the Center, research officer
Zha Li : female, staff of the office, research officer
Pro. He Shaohuan: female, doctorate supervisor
Hu Guoliang: male, research office
Wang Mei :female, advanced library researcher
Liu Rong: male, research officer
Dr. Huang Ruhua: female, research officer
Chen Yuan: female, research officer
Zhao Jiming: male, research officer
Dr. Zhu Xiaochi: male, vice- research officer
Liu Xia : female, vice-research officer, vice-editor of the journal
Zhu Yinmei: female, vice-research officer
He Wen : female, Master, librarian
Shu Mingquan: male, Master, librarian
Part-time researchers are listed as follows:
Ronald Rousseou：male, consultant of the Center, research officer. A famous metrologist of Belgium, the director of academic committee of the International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics (issi)
Pro. Jiang Guohua: male, consultant of the Center, research officer. Vice-dean of Chinese Academy of Management Science, vice-syndic of Chinese Association for Science of Science and S&T Policy (CASTP), director of the Scientometric Committee
Pro. Xie Kefan: male, research officer. Vice-dean of Management School of Wuhan University of Technology, doctorate supervisor
Pro. Fan Bingsi: male, research officer. Head of Information Management Department of East China Normal University
Pro. Dang Yaru: female, research officer. Director of Information Science Institute in Tianjin University of Civil Aviation
Pro. Cui Lei: male, research officer. Professor of Information Management Department of China Medical University
Dr. Wang Yuefen: female, research officer. Professor, head of Information Management Department, Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Dr. Huang Xiaobin: male, research officer. Professor of Information Management Department of Sun Yat-Sen University.
Pro. Chen Guangzuo: male, consultant of the Center, research officer, doctorate supervisor
Pro. Qiu Junping : male, director of the Center, doctorate supervisor
Pro.Yan Jinwei: male, vice-director of the Center, research officer
Li Jinaping: male, vice-director of the Center, research officer
Dr. Zhang Liyi: male, vice-director of the Center, research officer
Zhou Minghua: male, director of the research branch, research officer
Dr. Zhou Liming: female, director of the office, research officer
Dr. Zhang Meijuan: female, secretary of the Center, research officer
Zha Li : female, staff of the office, research officer
Pro. He Shaohuan: female, doctorate supervisor
Hu Guoliang: male, research office
Wang Mei :female, advanced library researcher
Liu Rong: male, research officer
Dr. Huang Ruhua: female, research officer
Chen Yuan: female, research officer
Zhao Jiming: male, research officer
Dr. Zhu Xiaochi: male, vice- research officer
Liu Xia : female, vice-research officer, vice-editor of the journal
Zhu Yinmei: female, vice-research officer
He Wen : female, Master, librarian
Shu Mingquan: male, Master, librarian
Part-time researchers are listed as follows:
Ronald Rousseou：male, consultant of the Center, research officer. A famous metrologist of Belgium, the director of academic committee of the International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics (issi)
Pro. Jiang Guohua: male, consultant of the Center, research officer. Vice-dean of Chinese Academy of Management Science, vice-syndic of Chinese Association for Science of Science and S&T Policy (CASTP), director of the Scientometric Committee
Pro. Xie Kefan: male, research officer. Vice-dean of Management School of Wuhan University of Technology, doctorate supervisor
Pro. Fan Bingsi: male, research officer. Head of Information Management Department of East China Normal University
Pro. Dang Yaru: female, research officer. Director of Information Science Institute in Tianjin University of Civil Aviation
Pro. Cui Lei: male, research officer. Professor of Information Management Department of China Medical University
Dr. Wang Yuefen: female, research officer. Professor, head of Information Management Department, Nanjing University of Science and Technology
Dr. Huang Xiaobin: male, research officer. Professor of Information Management Department of Sun Yat-Sen University.
4 Criterion: Profile of reviewers:
Measure: The profile of the reviewers is consistent with the Mission Statement
Measure: The profile of the reviewers is consistent with the Mission Statement
Description: Evaluation Center of Chinese Education Quality, ECCEQ has been engaged in the science, education, and coporation evaluation for years. With a great importance attached to the application of research results, the Center has endeavored to provide a wide range of evaluation and advisory services for government departments and other social sectors. The Center has "A Report on the Competitiveness Evaluation of Universities and Subjects in China", "An evaluation report on Subject Competitivenss of World-class universities and Research institutions", "a report on chinese academic journal evaluation" published each year.
Here is "An evaluation report on Subject Competitivenss of World-class universities and Research institutions in 2011".
Here is "An evaluation report on Subject Competitivenss of World-class universities and Research institutions in 2011".
5 Criterion: Independence:
Measure: The judgements and recommendations of the agency’s reports cannot be changed by third parties
Measure: The judgements and recommendations of the agency’s reports cannot be changed by third parties
Description: The Evaluation Center of Chinese Education Quality, ECCEQ is an academic institution of across-liberal-arts-and-science trans-disciplines, which is co-sponsored by Information Management School, the Universityâ??s Library, Computer Center and Library & Information Institute of Wuhan University, and is located in the Information Management School.
6 Criterion: Resources:
Measure: The agency has sufficient resources to run its operations in accordance with its mission statement and objectives
Measure: The agency has sufficient resources to run its operations in accordance with its mission statement and objectives
Description: Wuhan University is now the unique academic institution setting up the doctoral study program of Informetrics and Science Evaluation in the country, which enjoy much academic repute with a passel of scholars and treatises of great influence both home and abroad. Many research institutes related to science evaluation nationwide are located in Wuhan University, such as the Ministry of Educationâ??s Information Resource Net of Chinaâ??s Colleges and Universities, the Social Science Management Research Institute of All-Chinaâ??s Colleges and Universities etc., and several teachers assume the academic office in the domain of all-Chinaâ??s science evaluation and management. During the past few years, the university has carried out multi-discipline comprehensive researches focused on science evaluation, charged with and accomplished above 10 national and provincial research programs, acquired many research findings and work experiences, which shows its quite strong research power and groundwork.
The Center takes on or is commissioned to do 5-odd research projects of various kinds each year.
The Center sets guest research projects for well-known specialties or part-time researchers to do in the Center for 1 to 6 months every year.
The Center often co-operate research programs or evaluation activities with government organizations, scientific and educational institutions and enterprises.
The Center irregularly hosts or co-sponsors with other organizations from home and abroad academic symposiums, in order to strengthen exchanges and probe into key problems in the field of evaluation.
The Center builds study and exchange system including irregular references of academic reports, symposiums, exchange among experts and forums by network, etc.
The Center recruits master degree candidates and doctorate candidates in the field of Information Management and Science Evaluation from the whole country every year in order to foster leading scholars and advanced specialized personnel of science evaluation; it gathers special researchers in the country to jointly do the Centerâ??s projects or tackle some key items in order to enhance entirely the research quality and level and to cultivate midlife-and- youth key specialized researchers for the countryâ??s science evaluation career; it also develop to make itself a nationwide important education & training center of science & technology management and evaluation by the way of providing continuing education and training service for science & technology agency personnel.
The Center takes on or is commissioned to do 5-odd research projects of various kinds each year.
The Center sets guest research projects for well-known specialties or part-time researchers to do in the Center for 1 to 6 months every year.
The Center often co-operate research programs or evaluation activities with government organizations, scientific and educational institutions and enterprises.
The Center irregularly hosts or co-sponsors with other organizations from home and abroad academic symposiums, in order to strengthen exchanges and probe into key problems in the field of evaluation.
The Center builds study and exchange system including irregular references of academic reports, symposiums, exchange among experts and forums by network, etc.
The Center recruits master degree candidates and doctorate candidates in the field of Information Management and Science Evaluation from the whole country every year in order to foster leading scholars and advanced specialized personnel of science evaluation; it gathers special researchers in the country to jointly do the Centerâ??s projects or tackle some key items in order to enhance entirely the research quality and level and to cultivate midlife-and- youth key specialized researchers for the countryâ??s science evaluation career; it also develop to make itself a nationwide important education & training center of science & technology management and evaluation by the way of providing continuing education and training service for science & technology agency personnel.
7 Criterion: External quality assurance criteria and processes:
Measure: The description of the processes and criteria applied should be transparent and publicly available and normally include:
self evaluation, site visit, public report and follow-up measure
Measure: The description of the processes and criteria applied should be transparent and publicly available and normally include:
self evaluation, site visit, public report and follow-up measure
Description: The centre website is http://rccse.whu.edu.cn/default.asp.
The center edits and publishes a journal Evaluation & Management, 4 to 6 issues each year, which covers the development status and trends in the field of evaluation home and abroad, publishes research achievements and evaluation reports, and exchanges relevant information and propagandize evaluation activities and so on.
The Center sets up a Web site of its own, which functions as an important position and window to promulgate research achievements and academic exchange.
Anticipative monograghic evaluation reports and databases will be included the evaluation report of Chinaâ??s science and technology, the evaluation report of Chinaâ??s social science, the evaluation report of Chinaâ??s Universities, the comparative research and evaluation report of Chinese and foreign-language journals (including digital journals and network journals), and the research and evaluation report of a series of American SCI source journals and scientific indexes. Building basic databases of evaluation in which the basic data of evaluation methods, models, index systems and evaluation objects is to support the scientific evaluation work with systematic and basic data.
The center edits and publishes a journal Evaluation & Management, 4 to 6 issues each year, which covers the development status and trends in the field of evaluation home and abroad, publishes research achievements and evaluation reports, and exchanges relevant information and propagandize evaluation activities and so on.
The Center sets up a Web site of its own, which functions as an important position and window to promulgate research achievements and academic exchange.
Anticipative monograghic evaluation reports and databases will be included the evaluation report of Chinaâ??s science and technology, the evaluation report of Chinaâ??s social science, the evaluation report of Chinaâ??s Universities, the comparative research and evaluation report of Chinese and foreign-language journals (including digital journals and network journals), and the research and evaluation report of a series of American SCI source journals and scientific indexes. Building basic databases of evaluation in which the basic data of evaluation methods, models, index systems and evaluation objects is to support the scientific evaluation work with systematic and basic data.
8 Criterion: Quality assurance:
Measure: The description of the processes and criteria applied should be transparent and publicly available and normally include:
self evaluation, site visit, public report and follow-up measure
Measure: The description of the processes and criteria applied should be transparent and publicly available and normally include:
self evaluation, site visit, public report and follow-up measure
Description: In the future, the Center will do its best to confirm the normal operation. Besides, the Center will continue its evaluation report and other evaluation services. And those professors of the Center will keep training more talent like postgraduates and PhD. In that case, the Center would do more research on the quality of higher education management.
Criteria Requirements for Institutional Member
Institutional Member Criteria:
Measure: Institutional Members are institutions of higher education in the region that are in good standing with the relevant quality assurance agency if one exists.
Measure: Institutional Members are institutions of higher education in the region that are in good standing with the relevant quality assurance agency if one exists.
Proof of recognition as a Higher Education Institution: Applicable Only For Institutional Members
Proof of the organisation’s good standing with the local QA agency: Applicable Only For Institutional Members
Criteria Requirements for Associate Member
Associate Member Criteria:
Measure:Associate Members are organisations with a major interest and active involvement in evaluation, accreditation and quality assurance in higher education, but without the responsibility for assuring the quality of institutions, education programs, or external quality assurance agencies
Measure:Associate Members are organisations with a major interest and active involvement in evaluation, accreditation and quality assurance in higher education, but without the responsibility for assuring the quality of institutions, education programs, or external quality assurance agencies
Applicable Only For Associate Members
Criteria Requirements for Intermediate Member
1 Criterion: Nature of the operations of the agency:
Measure: The agency is responsible for reviews at institutional or programme level of post-secondary education institutions or post-secondary quality assurance agencies
Measure: The agency is responsible for reviews at institutional or programme level of post-secondary education institutions or post-secondary quality assurance agencies
Description: Applicable Only For Intermediate Members
2 Criterion: Mission statement and objectives:
Measure: The agency has formulated a mission statement and objectives which are consistent with the nature of the agency
Measure: The agency has formulated a mission statement and objectives which are consistent with the nature of the agency
Applicable Only For Intermediate Members
3 Criterion: :
Proof of the organisation’s good standing with the local QA agency
Proof of the organisation’s good standing with the local QA agency
Applicable Only For Intermediate Members
Criteria Requirements for Observer
Criterion For Observers:
Measure: APQN accepts as Observers organisations outside the Asia-Pacific region, including: external quality assurance agencies; institutions with a major interest in evaluation, accreditation and quality assurance in higher education; other regional networks that have major interests in and strong links with the region
Measure: APQN accepts as Observers organisations outside the Asia-Pacific region, including: external quality assurance agencies; institutions with a major interest in evaluation, accreditation and quality assurance in higher education; other regional networks that have major interests in and strong links with the region
Criteria Requirements for Observer: Applicable Only For Observers
Documentation and Fees
Additional Information: No additional information is required for my application
Upon approval of my application I agree to pay:
- $500 (Initial Joining Fee: Full Member, Intermediate Member, Associate Member)
- $300 Member Fee: Full Member, Intermediate Member (if not INQAAHE Member)
I will be applying for support for: None
Documents Submitted
Located in: APQN Members
